In today's fast-paced, information-saturated world of social media and mindset gurus, psychological terms have become part of our everyday vocabulary. However, as these terms gain popularity, they often fail to provide an understanding of mental health education and mental health conditions. This article explores five common psychological buzzwords that are frequently misused, potentially undermining their true clinical significance and complicating genuine mental health discussions and support. 

Throughout years of providing evidence-based psychotherapy, particularly working with high-achieving professionals I have observed how casually thrown psychological labels can create misunderstandings, heighten workplace tensions, exacerbate relationship anxiety, and even discourage individuals from seeking proper mental health support, therefore causing many to suffer in silence. I have heard terms like 'triggered', 'narcissistic', and 'traumatised' used to describe workplace experiences that, while challenging, often fall short of their clinical definitions.

Based on these observations, we need a more nuanced understanding of these terms in our daily discourse. Sharing these insights can help develop more psychologically informed professionals in influential positions, such as HR managers, decision-makers, business leaders, and executives. Through mental health education, we can drive the implementation of high-quality corporate mental wellness programmes and ensure the selection of effective Employee Assistance Programme (EAP) providers for professionals. This approach will not only improve mental health literacy among those in charge but also foster a more psychologically educated corporate culture, ultimately leading to better mental health support structures in the workplace. 

1. Rethinking the 'toxic' workplace narrative 

Myth: Difficult work situations or people are inherently 'toxic'.

Overusing 'toxic' can oversimplify complex issues and hinder resolution.

The casual use of the 'toxic' label to describe challenging workplace situations or co-workers has become increasingly prevalent in recent years. While some environments can indeed be stressful and even detrimental to mental health, this label often oversimplifies complex interpersonal dynamics. It can be counterproductive when dealing with work-related stress, particularly in conflicts between professionals.

It is common for clients in therapy to report challenging workplace scenarios: high-stakes decision-making environments, diverse and conflicting communication styles with managers and co-workers, misaligned expectations with clients and stakeholders, and the strain of inadequate support and resources. While these issues can indeed create significant stress, they are often labelled under the broad brush of 'my workplace is toxic' or 'my manager is toxic'. This oversimplification, though tempting, can obscure the intricate nature of workplace relationships and organizational cultures, potentially impeding constructive dialogue and meaningful solutions.

A deeper understanding of actual behaviours and their impacts leads to more constructive outcomes, better team dynamics, and improved workplace relationships. Psychological therapy helps clients identify specific triggers, thoughts, feelings, and behaviours related to stressors in the workplace, rather than generalising and using terms such as 'toxic' to describe a person, a relationship, or an environment. Therapy provides a valuable space for exploring the patterns and contexts in which workplace issues repeatedly arise. It can encourage clients to consider multiple perspectives and reflect on their own roles and reactions, as well as those of their colleagues and management. By developing these skills, individuals can gain a more balanced view of their work environment, leading to more effective problem-solving and healthier work relations. 

In therapy, clients can shift from focusing on others as the problem to adopting a solution-focused mindset that encourages changes from within. It empowers them to look inward and make necessary, proactive changes within their control to improve workplace relationships and dynamics. For example, instead of labelling a manager as 'toxic' for frequent criticism, one might consider whether the feedback received is constructive but poorly delivered, whether pressure from higher up is filtering down, if unrealistic deadlines are creating tension for everyone, or perhaps there is a misalignment between job expectations and actual performance. This process not only increases self-awareness but also enhances emotional intelligence—both of which are key to achieving personal and professional success.

2. Misuse of clinical terms: The 'narcissistic' label

Myth: Ambitious or highly competitive colleagues must be narcissistic.

Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) is a specific clinical diagnosis, not a label for high-achieving professionals.

While some colleagues and managers may occasionally display self-centred traits, this does not equate to a psychological disorder. A certain level of self-interest is normal in competitive fields. For example, when a colleague sends a celebratory email that feels overly self-congratulatory, or a boss takes credit for the team's success without acknowledging individual contributions, it is tempting to call such behaviours 'narcissistic.'

Often the term 'narcissist' is quickly applied in the workplace (and in personal relationships). This oversimplification ignores the complexities of human behaviour in high-stakes environments. What may be hastily labelled as narcissism could stem from various underlying factors, including unaddressed mental health struggles, personality clashes between ambitious colleagues, or the intense pressures of high-stakes professional environments. Casual use of clinical terms like 'narcissistic' can be problematic, misleading, and potentially harmful to one's professional and personal reputation. 

According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), NPD is characterised by a pervasive pattern of grandiosity, a need for admiration, and a lack of empathy. It is a complex psychological condition requiring professional diagnosis, not a label to be casually applied to colleagues, managers or any individual who displays self-centred behaviour or ambition. 

While NPD exists, it is rare, and by being precise in our language and nuanced in our understanding, we can create healthier, more productive work environments, even in the most demanding fields. It’s essential to differentiate between healthy ambition and pathological narcissism. In competitive fields, many professionals display high levels of confidence, assertiveness, and drive. These traits alone do not indicate a personality disorder. A colleague or manager who appears self-centred or overly ambitious does not automatically have NPD. 

Psychological therapy can provide a confidential space to navigate these dynamics by gaining insights into one’s behaviours and understanding the impact of their work environment. This approach leads to more effective communication and collaboration with colleagues and managers.

If you are concerned about someone’s behavior, and notice a consistent pattern of problematic interactions, it is wise to seek guidance from a clinical professional. Psychotherapy can help identify and address unhealthy behaviours in the workplace—whether it’s your own, your manager’s, or your colleagues’. By using precise language and avoiding the misuse of clinical terms, we can foster a more understanding and psychologically healthy work environment while still addressing genuine concerns about workplace behaviour and mental health.

3. The 'boundary setting' panacea

Myth: 'Setting boundaries' is the ultimate solution to workplace stress for all professionals.

I often encounter clients who have embraced 'boundary setting' as a cure-all for workplace stress, including familial relationships. While this skill can be beneficial, particularly for those who struggle to assert their needs or develop an equal ‘give and take’ in relationships, it's not a panacea. There is a crucial distinction between rigid and loose boundaries, each with its implications in the workplace.

Rigid boundaries, while seemingly protective, can hinder professional relationships and career growth, manifesting as inflexibility or difficulty collaborating. Conversely, loose boundaries might lead to burnout or a lack of work-life balance. The key lies in developing healthy, flexible boundaries that allow for both professional growth and personal well-being.

Career progression largely depends on one's ability to form and maintain professional relationships. The need for and effectiveness of boundary-setting is influenced by factors such as job demands, organisational culture, work-life integration preferences, and long-term career objectives.

While social media promotes various non-clinically proven methods for mental health wellness, when dealing with work-related stress professionals may want to consider evidence-based psychotherapy. This can address underlying issues such as low self-esteem, anxiety, or depression that may impact professional relationship development and maintenance. Therapy can be instrumental in helping individuals understand their current boundary-setting patterns and develop healthier, more effective strategies.

Remember, setting boundaries is a valuable tool, but it's not a one-size-fits-all solution. The key is developing a personalised strategy that aligns with your individual needs, personality, and professional goals. By taking a thoughtful, individualised approach, professionals can find sustainable ways to nurture work relations, so that they can thrive in their careers while maintaining emotional and mental well-being.

4. Living my best life pressure – A corporate paradox

Myth: Constantly striving to be one's 'best self' is the key to professional success and happiness.

This concept often creates unrealistic and unhealthy expectations and unnecessary pressure, particularly in demanding corporate environments.

In today’s corporate landscape, the pursuit of an idealised 'best self' has become pervasive. While self-development is valuable, this concept can paradoxically lead to decreased job satisfaction and increased anxiety, especially in high-pressure environments where excellence is already expected.

For high-achieving professionals, the drive for perfection can yield impressive performance metrics but often comes at the cost of emotional well-being and mental health. The constant pressure to 'live your best life' or embody one’s 'best self' creates unrealistic expectations and undue stress, particularly in careers where excellence is the baseline.

Balancing ambition with self-acceptance and setting realistic goals is essential for sustainable career progression. Recognising and accepting one’s limitations while striving for achievable objectives promotes well-being and long-term success. In contrast, adhering to unhealthy perfectionistic standards often leads to burnout, disappointment, and an intensified ‘fear of failure’ and ‘fear of judgment’, all of which can exacerbate stress and anxiety in the long term. 

I frequently work with executives and managers struggling with anxiety stemming from perfectionism and unhealthy performance standards. This often manifests as:

1. Procrastination and indecision on high-stakes projects

2. A paralysing fear of failure or fear of judgment

3. Chronic worry about being 'exposed' as incompetent (relating to imposter syndrome and social anxiety)

4. Low self-esteem masked by outward confidence (maintaining the need for constant ‘external validation’)

In therapy many burnt-out and overwhelmed professionals share a common fear: that any mistake will be catastrophic, potentially exposing them as inadequate or unfit for their role. This pervasive anxiety stems from the high-stakes nature of their work, where errors can have significant financial or legal consequences. The pressure to maintain an image of infallibility often leads to heightened stress levels and can contribute to a culture of unhealthy perfectionism. This fear not only affects individual well-being but can also hinder creativity, risk-taking, and genuine professional growth within these industries.

Therapeutic interventions can help identify the root causes of workplace unhealthy perfectionism and provide tools to manage these pressures. By shifting the focus from an idealised 'best self' to a more realistic and compassionate self-view, professionals can maintain high standards while safeguarding their mental health, leading to a more fulfilling life overall. Ultimately, sustainable success and job satisfaction come not from relentlessly pursuing an elusive 'best' version of oneself, but from striking a balance between ambition and self-acceptance. This approach fosters professional growth without compromising mental well-being.

For corporate leaders and professionals, it’s crucial to foster a culture that values continuous improvement without glorifying the 'best self' myth. Encouraging realistic goal setting, celebrating incremental progress, and providing resources for mental health support can help organisations cultivate resilient, high-performing teams built on sustainable excellence rather than unattainable perfectionism.

5. The trigger trap: When everyday workplace stress masquerades as trauma 

Myth: Any strong emotional reaction means being 'triggered'

Being 'triggered' has a specific clinical meaning distinct from everyday emotional reactions.

Imagine this scenario in therapy: A client recounts how their line manager criticised their presentation during a board meeting, leaving them feeling angry and embarrassed. Later, whilst describing the incident to a colleague over a pint, they say, "I was so triggered!" But were they?

Terms like 'triggered' and 'traumatised' have become commonplace in everyday discussions, casually used to describe any strong emotional reaction to workplace stress. This imprecise use of language blurs the line between everyday work pressures and genuine psychological distress, potentially trivialising the experiences of those grappling with psychological trauma responses or mental health conditions.

Therapy provides psychoeducation, clarifying that trauma typically involves events where one believes their life, or someone else's, is in danger. Being 'triggered', in psychological terms, refers to experiencing a distressing reaction to a stimulus, often related to past trauma or a mental health condition. The American Psychological Association's definition of 'trigger' includes intense responses such as flashbacks, panic attacks, or severe anxiety. In a corporate environment, it is vital to differentiate between being 'triggered' and experiencing normal workplace stress or conflict.

The overuse of these terms in corporate settings can inadvertently undermine the experiences of colleagues who have faced traumatic situations (i.e. abuse) and or may be suffering from symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). By using more precise language, we can ensure appropriate support for those with clinical trauma responses and encourage healthy coping mechanisms for everyday work stress. 

Through mental health education, we can contribute to a more psychologically aware workplace by being mindful of our language when discussing emotional and mental health-related experiences. We can strive to educate ourselves and our colleagues about the accurate meanings of clinical terms and encourage open dialogues about workplace stress without resorting to unnecessary clinical labels. When genuine mental health concerns arise, it is important to promote access to appropriate psychological support.

By cultivating this awareness, we can create a work environment that is both high-performing and supportive of genuine psychological concerns, significantly impacting both performance and mental well-being in the corporate world.

Conclusion

The misuse of psychological buzzwords like 'narcissist', 'triggered', and 'toxic' in high-pressure corporate environments can hinder career progression and obscure genuine mental health concerns. While concepts such as 'boundary setting' and 'living my best life' have merit, their casual overuse can dilute their significance and lead to the breakdown of professional relationships thus causing stress, anxiety, and burn-out.

For high-achieving professionals in stress-intensive fields, it is crucial to develop a nuanced understanding of these terms and their proper contexts. Mental health education and increased psychological awareness are key to navigating the complexities of modern workplaces effectively. Psychotherapy, particularly solution-focused approaches, offers valuable tools and strategies to address these challenges.

By learning to accurately identify and articulate workplace issues without resorting to clinical labels, professionals can foster more constructive dialogue and create healthier work environments. This approach ensures that those genuinely struggling with mental health issues receive the understanding and support they need.

The goal is to move beyond buzzwords and develop a more sophisticated emotional vocabulary. This enables high achievers to address workplace challenges with precision, empathy, and effectiveness. By investing in mental health education and utilising science-based therapeutic tools, professionals can enhance their resilience, improve interpersonal relationships, and achieve sustainable success in their demanding careers.

Evidence-based psychotherapy is available to anyone who is being affected by work-related stress, in need of mental health support or seeking guidance from a clinically trained professional for valuable insights and strategies. To take the first step towards developing a more nuanced understanding of workplace psychology and improving your professional relationships, visit here. For personalised guidance and support, contact us here.

Follow me on Linkedin for more info!